Current:Home > InvestFastexy:Evers vetoes a Republican-backed bill targeting PFAS chemicals -NextWave Wealth Hub
Fastexy:Evers vetoes a Republican-backed bill targeting PFAS chemicals
Robert Brown View
Date:2025-04-10 00:19:41
MADISON,Fastexy Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers vetoed a Republican bill Tuesday that would have created grants to fight pollution from “forever chemicals” and took the unusual step of calling the GOP-controlled budget committee into meeting to approve spending $125 million to deal with contamination.
Evers has only called a meeting of the Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee once before, a rarely used power afforded the governor under state law.
Evers and Republicans have not been able to agree on the best way to combat pollution from PFAS, chemicals that have polluted groundwater in communities across the state. Evers and Republicans have both said that fighting the chemicals is a priority, but they haven’t been able to come together on what to do about it.
Evers said it was “just wrong” that lawmakers have not approved spending the $125 million that was allocated to combat PFAS in the state budget passed last year.
“There is no reason Wisconsinites should have to wait any longer than they already have for these funds to be released,” Evers said in a statement. “This is about doing the right thing for our kids, our families, and our communities, and it should’ve been done a long time ago. This must get done.”
The bill Evers vetoed called for spending the money on grants for municipalities, private landowners and waste disposal facilities to test for PFAS in water treatment plants and wells. Landowners with property that became contaminated through no fault of their own also would have been eligible for grants.
Evers said in his veto message that he objected to the bill because it would limit the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources’ authority to hold polluters liable.
Multiple environmental groups urged Evers to veto the legislation, saying the limits on DNR enforcement are a deal-breaker.
Republican bill authors argued that the limits are necessary to protect landowners who aren’t responsible for PFAS pollution on their property from fines.
PFAS, short for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are man-made chemicals that don’t easily break down in nature. They are found in a wide range of products, including cookware and stain-resistant clothing, and previously were often used in aviation fire-suppression foam. The chemicals have been linked to health problems including low birth weight, cancer and liver disease, and have been shown to make vaccines less effective.
Municipalities across Wisconsin are struggling with PFAS contamination in groundwater, including Marinette, Madison, Wausau and the town of Campbell on French Island. The waters of Green Bay also are contaminated.
veryGood! (251)
Related
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Carbon Removal Is Coming to Fossil Fuel Country. Can It Bring Jobs and Climate Action?
- TikTok’s Favorite Oil-Absorbing Face Roller Is Only $8 for Amazon Prime Day 2023
- Illinois Clean Energy Law’s Failed Promises: No New Jobs or Job-Training
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Amazon Prime Day 2023 Deal: Don't Miss This 30% Off Apple AirPods Discount
- A first-class postal economics primer
- Affirmative action for rich kids: It's more than just legacy admissions
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- The Energy Department Hails a Breakthrough in Fusion Energy, Achieving a Net Energy Gain With Livermore’s Vast Laser Array
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Proof Emily Blunt and Matt Damon's Kids Have the Most Precious Friendship
- Russia's nixing of Ukraine grain deal deepens worries about global food supply
- Texas Regulators Won’t Stop an Oilfield Waste Dump Site Next to Wetlands, Streams and Wells
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Is ‘Chemical Recycling’ a Solution to the Global Scourge of Plastic Waste or an Environmentally Dirty Ruse to Keep Production High?
- Amazon Prime Day 2023: Get a Portable Garment Steamer With 65,000+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews for Just $28
- Twitter replaces its bird logo with an X as part of Elon Musk's plan for a super app
Recommendation
Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
Ryan Reynolds, John Legend and More Stars React to 2023 Emmy Nominations
After Criticism, Gas Industry Official Withdraws as Candidate for Maryland’s Public Service Commission
Expedition Retraces a Legendary Explorer’s Travels Through the Once-Pristine Everglades
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Why Patrick Mahomes Says Wife Brittany Has a “Good Sense” on How to Handle Online Haters
Why American Aluminum Plants Emit Far More Climate Pollution Than Some of Their Counterparts Abroad
Summer School 1: Planet Money goes to business school