Current:Home > InvestCharles Langston:Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases -NextWave Wealth Hub
Charles Langston:Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases
SafeX Pro View
Date:2025-04-08 21:54:19
The Charles LangstonSupreme Court decided 6-3 and 6-2 that race-conscious admission policies of the University of North Carolina and Harvard College violate the Constitution, effectively bringing to an end to affirmative action in higher education through a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
The rulings fell along ideological lines. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for both cases, and Justice Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh wrote concurring opinions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ties to Harvard and recused herself in that case, but wrote a dissent in the North Carolina case.
The ruling is the latest from the Supreme Court's conservative majority that has upended decades of precedent, including overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.
- Read the full text of the decision
Here's how the justices split on the affirmative action cases:
Supreme Court justices who voted against affirmative action
The court's six conservatives formed the majority in each cases. Roberts' opinion was joined by Thomas, Samuel Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The chief justice wrote that Harvard and UNC's race-based admission guidelines "cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause."
"Respondents' race-based admissions systems also fail to comply with the Equal Protection Clause's twin commands that race may never be used as a 'negative' and that it may not operate as a stereotype," Roberts wrote. "The First Circuit found that Harvard's consideration of race has resulted in fewer admissions of Asian-American students. Respondents' assertion that race is never a negative factor in their admissions programs cannot withstand scrutiny. College admissions are zerosum, and a benefit provided to some applicants but not to others necessarily advantages the former at the expense of the latter. "
Roberts said that prospective students should be evaluated "as an individual — not on the basis of race," although universities can still consider "an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold affirmative action
The court's three liberals all opposed the majority's decision to reject race as a factor in college admissions. Sotomayor's dissent was joined by Justice Elena Kagan in both cases, and by Jackson in the UNC case. Both Sotomayor and Kagan signed onto Jackson's dissent as well.
Sotomayor argued that the admissions processes are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment enshrines a guarantee of racial equality," Sotomayor wrote. "The Court long ago concluded that this guarantee can be enforced through race-conscious means in a society that is not, and has never been, colorblind."
In her dissent in the North Carolina case, Jackson recounted the long history of discrimination in the U.S. and took aim at the majority's ruling.
"With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces 'colorblindness for all' by legal fiat," Jackson wrote. "But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life."
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Affirmative Action
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (7)
Related
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Olympic skater being investigated for alleged sexual assault of former American skater
- Florida man charged with threatening to kill US Rep Eric Swalwell and his children
- Fire at home of Dolphins' star Tyreek Hill was accidental. Fire marshal reveals cause
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- In ‘The Brothers Sun,’ Michelle Yeoh again leads an immigrant family with dark humor — but new faces
- Over a week after pregnant Texas teen Savanah Soto and boyfriend Matthew Guerra killed, a father and son have been arrested
- Michigan vs. Washington national title game marks the end of college football as we know it
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Make these 5 New Year's resolutions to avoid scams this year
Ranking
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Thousands attend the funeral of a top Hamas official killed in an apparent Israeli strike in Beirut
- Putin speeds up a citizenship path for foreigners who enlist in the Russian military
- The US Tennis Association is reviewing its safeguarding policies and procedures
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Nikki Haley’s Republican rivals are ramping up their attacks on her as Iowa’s caucuses near
- Poor schools are prepared to return to court if Pennsylvania budget falls short on funding plan
- NCAA agrees to $920 million, 8-year deal with ESPN for women’s March Madness, 39 other championships
Recommendation
The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
Voters file an objection to Trump’s name on the Illinois ballot
Largest male specimen of world’s most venomous spider found in Australia. Meet Hercules.
Live updates | Hamas loses a leader in Lebanon but holds on in Gaza
Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
Parents of Cyprus school volleyball team players killed in Turkish quake testify against hotel owner
Ailing, 53-year-old female elephant euthanized at Los Angeles Zoo
Pittsburgh family dog eats $4,000 in cash