Current:Home > MarketsGoogle to pay $700 million in case over whether its app store is an illegal monopoly -NextWave Wealth Hub
Google to pay $700 million in case over whether its app store is an illegal monopoly
View
Date:2025-04-15 19:39:59
Google has agreed to pay $700 million and will make changes to its app store it has resisted for years in order to resolve a an antitrust lawsuit brought by state attorneys general, the company announced on Monday.
As part of the deal, Google said it would now allow app developers to charge consumers directly, instead of being billed through Google, where the company can take up to a 30% cut.
The tech giant said it will also simplify the process of making apps available for download outside of its own app marketplace, known as the Google Play store.
These changes to Google's app store are significant considering that app developers, policymakers and others have long pushed for Google to loosen its grip over how apps are downloaded and paid for on Android devices. But only now, as legal and regulatory pressure coalesces around the app store, is Google making major concessions.
"We're pleased to resolve our case with the states and move forward on a settlement," Wilson White, Google vice president of government affairs and public policy, said in a company blog post.
While states announced a settlement with Google back in September, the details were unknown until the company publicly revealed the terms of the agreement on Monday.
In the suit that prompted the settlement, filed back in July, more than 30 states accused Google of operating its app store like an illegal monopoly by suppressing competition and overcharging consumers for subscriptions to mobile apps, and other purchases within Google's app store.
Google will contribute $630 million into a settlement fund for consumers and $70 million will be provided to the dozens of states that brought the legal action against the tech behemoth.
Terms of settlement were kept confidential as another legal case aimed at Google's app store unfolded. This one, filed by Epic Games, the maker of the hit video game Fortnite, ended last week with a California jury unanimously deciding that Google's Play Store violated U.S. competition laws by squelching competition and harming consumers.
A federal judge will hold hearings in January about what changes Google must make in order to remedy the anti-trust issues raised in court at the trial.
Google's app store has been in the crosshairs of lawmakers around the world. In both South Korea and the European Union, laws have been passed mandating that Google open up its app store by doing things like allowing consumers to download and pay for apps directly from developers.
On iPhones, Apple operates an app store under terms similar to Google, and it, too, has been the target of scrutiny in lawsuits and by policymakers. Epic Games also sued Apple over its app store policies. In September 2021, a federal judge largely sided with Apple, but Epic Games is appealing the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.
White, the Google executive, said the company is appealing last week's jury verdict against the app store, saying the case is "far from over."
Google, one of the most valuable companies in the world, is now confronting more antitrust challenges than it ever has, as several other legal battles over whether the company abuses its immense power remain pending. Among them, a case brought by the Justice Department centered on Google allegedly breaking the law in maintaining its dominance of online search and advertising.
A federal judge is expected to rule on the case sometime in 2024.
veryGood! (45)
Related
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Jewel Has Cryptic Message on Love Amid Kevin Costner Dating Rumors
- Wisconsin Supreme Court will decide whether mobile voting sites are legal
- South Dakota Gov. Noem erroneously describes meeting with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un in new book
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- US loosens some electric vehicle battery rules, potentially making more EVs eligible for tax credits
- Wisconsin Supreme Court will decide whether mobile voting sites are legal
- What does '6:16 in LA' mean? Fans analyze Kendrick Lamar's latest Drake diss
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Arizona GOP wins state high court appeal of sanctions for 2020 election challenge
Ranking
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Three groups are suing New Jersey to block an offshore wind farm
- Zebra remains on the loose in Washington state as officials close trailheads to keep people away
- Indiana Fever move WNBA preseason home game to accommodate Pacers' playoff schedule
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Reports: Odell Beckham Jr. to sign with Miami Dolphins, his fourth team in four years
- Biden to award Medal of Freedom to Nancy Pelosi, Al Gore, Katie Ledecky and more
- Kevin Spacey hits back at documentary set to feature allegations 'dating back 48 years'
Recommendation
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
Republicans file lawsuit to block count of Nevada mail ballots received after Election Day
Fundraiser celebrating fraternities that guarded American flag during protest raises $500K
Judge says gun found in car of Myon Burrell, sentenced to life as teen, can be evidence in new case
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
What's a whistleblower? Key questions about employee protections after Boeing supplier dies
Avoid boring tasks and save time with AI and chatbots: Here's how
New Hampshire moves to tighten rules on name changes for violent felons